Proposed cuts to senior program funding spark outrage

Photo: Timothy Valentine via Flickr

By now, most of you are probably aware of the controversial remarks made by Mick Mulvaney, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, about the administration’s proposed 2017 budget, which would adversely affect home- and community-based services for the elderly.

Among them is Meals on Wheels, which provides daily nutritious food to homebound older adults, the disabled and veterans.

We can’t spend money on programs just because they sound good,” Mulvaney said. “And Meals on Wheels sounds great — again, that’s a state decision to fund that particular portion. But to take the federal money and give it to the states and say, look, we want to give you money for programs that don’t work, I can’t defend that anymore. We’re going to spend a lot of money, but we’re not going to spend it on programs that cannot show that they actually deliver the promises that we’ve made to people.”

The remarks caused immediate backlash. An ensuing tweet storm, including several from Medicaid’s chief medical officer,  linked to study after study demonstrating the nutrition program’s success and value beyond a healthy meal.  Advocacy organizations, news analysis, and late-night TV hosts called Mulvaney’s comments everything from “mean-spirited,” to “obscene,” to “heartless.” Talk show host Seth Meyers, whose mother volunteers for the program, lambasted the proposal in a 10-minute long smackdown.

A point of clarification: reporter Glenn Kessler accurately pointed out that Mulvaney’s comments, and the budget proposal, actually refer to eliminating Community Development Block Grants, (CDBG) one of several Meals on Wheels funding sources. CDBGs also provide \ assistance with housing, energy, employment and other programs for vulnerable elderly, as The New York Times reported.

Ellie Hollander, president and CEO of Meals on Wheels, will speak about the program at the awards luncheon at Health Journalism 2017 on April 22.

The Meals on Wheels program helps some 2.4 million seniors each year, and spends about $1.4 billion annually. About 35 percent of local program funding comes through the Older Americans Act, which Congress reauthorized in 2016 for three years. The remainder of Meals on Wheels funding comes from CDBG, anti-poverty Community Services Block Grants (CSBG), other federal and state appropriations, and private donations. So not every local Meals on Wheels program will get hit the same way, according to CBS MarketWatch.

The administration’s proposed budget targets the greatest harm on those most in need, according to Robert Blancato, executive director, National Association of Nutrition and Aging Services Programs (NANASP). Cuts to the block grant program will “cripple our ability to provide essential services to low income people of all ages,” he said in a phone interview.

It comes at a time when states lack the resources to make up the funding, Blancato explained. “The states and localities that use CDBG money are going to be scrambling.” Since the budget is still in the proposal stages and must pass Congress, he said elder advocates must work with their elected officials to turn things around.

Mulvaney tried to make the case that cutting CDBG is actually compassionate, since taxpayer money will no longer fund “unproven programs,” but many pundits, and even members of his own party, don’t buy that argument, according to Salon. If CDBG disappears, states face some grim choices — including service cutbacks and longer waiting lists. “You have some real issues if these funds are not restored” Blancato added.

Studies show that home- and community-based services like Meals on Wheels are highly cost-effective over time. This analysis by Aaron Carroll shows just how much. “The return on this program shows up every day an older person gets a meal at home or in a congregate facility because they are not in a hospital getting that meal and they’re not in a nursing home getting that meal, which costs the federal government a whole lot more money,” Blancato said. This infographic shows where the money goes and some of program’s relative cost savings.

Ideas for journalists:

  • How is the Meals on Wheels program in your community funded?
  • What other home- and community-based services offer nutritional assistance for older, low-income, or disabled individuals? How would cuts to CDBG affect these programs?
  • How prevalent is food insecurity in your area? Are a large proportion of older adults receiving help from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)?
  • For many older adults, meal delivery is the only social contact they have all day. What happens to these socially isolated seniors? (Check out this post on social isolation and loneliness).
  • This tip sheet from Melinda Hemmelgarn, R.D., details the changing nutritional needs of older adults.
  • Feeding America has this breakdown of food insecurity by county and congressional district. Do your representatives support these cuts?
  • My tip sheet about the 2016 OAA reauthorization.
  • Facts about senior hunger from the National Council on Aging
  • Last fall, in a Covering Health post, Howard Gleckman made some predictions about what might happen to services for seniors during the Trump administration.

2 thoughts on “Proposed cuts to senior program funding spark outrage

  1. Avatar photoLiz Seegert Post author

    thanks Barbara. I saw that story, which confirms what this article says – most Meals on Wheels funding comes from other sources; and, the idea of cutting valuable programs for older adults – particularly those proven to be highly successful – is only hurting the most vulnerable among us. I think the Meals on Wheels angle got so much attention because it’s something everyone knows about and makes for a strong visual. It’s really hard to be against feeding elderly homebound.

Leave a Reply