Covering how King v. Burwell decision could affect subsidies

Lauren Sausser

Lauren Sausser

Lauren Sausser of The Post and Courier in South Carolina was surprised by an email from a reader asking her to write more about Medicaid expansion in South Carolina – specifically, the state’s refusal to expand the low-income health insurance program under the Affordable Care Act.

This year, health insurance subsidies have played a much more prominent role in The Post and Courier’s health care coverage. Like other news outlets, her newspaper is waiting to find out what the Supreme Court decides in King v. Burwell. If the court rules in favor of the plaintiffs, subsidies will end in states using the federal exchange.

In South Carolina, a King victory would mean that coverage will become unaffordable for an estimated 200,000 people who have purchased subsidized policies through the federal insurance marketplace. It’s been a big story. Meanwhile, Medicaid expansion, with a few exceptions, is relatively stagnant there.

Read more about her reporting on the topic.

2 thoughts on “Covering how King v. Burwell decision could affect subsidies

  1. Pingback: Things to keep in mind as we anticipate the King v. Burwell ruling | Association of Health Care Journalists

  2. Pingback: Notes and quotes from King v. Burwell decision | Association of Health Care Journalists

Leave a Reply