NYT’s Schwarz discusses football concussion beat

Andrew Van Dam

About Andrew Van Dam

Andrew Van Dam of The Wall Street Journal previously worked at the AHCJ offices while earning his master’s degree at the Missouri School of Journalism.

For the Columbia Journalism Review, Brent Cunningham talked to The New York Times‘ Alan Schwarz about his work as the nation’s leading (and probably only) full-time football head injury reporter. Schwarz, whose work covering concussions brought him to the Times in 2007, talks about how he got started on the beat and how his work has impacted the sport as a whole.

It’s all interesting stuff, especially when he discusses how his background in mathematics has helped him report on sports injuries and medicine, but the real payoff comes when Cunningham finally  gets Schwarz to divulge his personal stance on concussions in youth football. It’s a crystallization of all Schwarz has learned, as well as a delicate balancing act between his personal and professional ethics.

high school tackle

Photo by Eagle102.net via Flickr

CJR: Let’s assume for a minute that your son, who you said is three years old, is actually ten years old and he is clamoring to play Pop Warner football. Would the fact that you would then have to decide disqualify you from covering the story?

Schwarz: No, it wouldn’t disqualify me, though of course that’s up to my editors. But there is something about working here—and I’m not saying we’re better than everyone else, blah, blah, blah—but there is something that really inspires you to do the right thing, and to do the thing that helps you to cultivate the trust that allows readers to take you seriously. So I would probably let him play because if I didn’t it would compromise the reporting. It would compromise the trust that others and even the league may have in me. Now, I would not send him out to slaughter, but getting one concussion is not that big of a deal—it just isn’t. And to suggest otherwise is incredibly irresponsible. So if my kid gets one concussion then yeah, he doesn’t play anymore probably. But to not allow him on the field is, frankly, an overreaction. And if I didn’t allow him to play then yeah, it would be harder to cover the story, if only in my own mind. I believe that the cost to others of my not being able to cover this story as well would be greater than the cost of my kid getting one concussion and never playing again. I’m a very mathematical guy. I follow certain precepts. And those are the things that make sense to me. And I can’t tell my kid he can’t play, because then what am I going to tell the league? What am I going to tell my editors? It doesn’t work. It’s dissonant.

Related

7 thoughts on “NYT’s Schwarz discusses football concussion beat

  1. Pingback: NYTimes football concussions reporter talks press ethics - JR Minkel - Working Dogma - True/Slant

  2. Pingback: Attention focused on football’s neurological effects : Covering Health

  3. Elizabeth W

    Thanks for drawing my attention to Schwartz’s interview.

    As a football fan blogging for a website about women’s issues, I’ve been fascinated, both by how science has shaped public outcry against CTE and football-related injury; and also by the number of women at the forefront of the discussion.

    Women’s Voices For Change did a news roundup of some of the recent media coverage, and the women involved in agitating for change.
    I’d love to see the discussion continue in the off-season. Maybe time for some regulation and equipment innovations before next year’s draft?

  4. Pingback: NFL to post concussion warning in locker rooms : Covering Health

  5. Pingback: Concussion-related trauma masquerades as ALS : Covering Health

  6. Pingback: Pulitzer nods demonstrate breadth of health beat : Covering Health

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.