Health reporter finds conflicts between medical evidence, personal experience


Freelance writer Karen Brown is pictured at home in Northampton, MA on Tuesday, January 14, 2014. Brown has written a first person article about her cancer diagnosis and the agonizing dilemma of choosing between “watchful waiting” or possible overtreatment. (Matthew Cavanaugh for The Boston Globe)

Matthew CavanaughKaren D. Brown

When first diagnosed with breast cancer, journalist Karen D. Brown didn’t plan to write about it. But, as she met with surgeons, anesthesiologists and oncologists who presented her with treatment options, she found it was a lot more confusing than she had realized when reporting on the statistics.

All of a sudden I realized that my medical odyssey and the health news cycle had crossed orbits. I could write about my personal experience and also shed light on a bigger issue that I felt had not yet been told to death – namely, how hard it is for an individual to make decisions based on population-wide statistics, and politically loaded ones at that.

In this article for AHCJ, Brown tells us how she came to write a piece that appeared in The Boston Globe about the conflicts between statistics and emotions and how they affected her decisions.

She writes about how she chose the statistics that she included in her story, what information she did not include to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest in her future reporting and how she made sure her narrative was fair and accurate. Read about Brown’s experience.

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.