Today’s aging boomers may be less healthy elders than expected, study says

Photo by Mike Licht via Flickr

Image: Mike Licht via Flickr

New research refutes the common assumption that baby boomers are healthier than previous generations and will remain so into old age. Better education, higher income and lower smoking rates are offset by the negative impact of increasing body mass index and obesity-related health problems, according to a study in the current issue of the health policy journal Milbank Quarterly.

A longitudinal cohort study with 8,570 participants looked at the trajectory of self-rated health among four generations of Canadians: World War II-era (born between 1935 and 1944), older baby boomers (born between 1945 and 1954), younger baby boomers (born between 1955 and 1964), and Generation X (born between 1965 and 1974). In Canada, almost one-third of the population is between the ages of 46 and 65, according to the 2011 Canadian census.

Researchers said an important question for health policy and planning is whether the impact of aging baby boomers on the nation’s health system might be larger or smaller that that of other generations. That’s because baby boomers’ characteristics and health behaviors are different from those of their older and younger counterparts. Boomers were the first generation to have greater access to health care and services, such as regular immunizations, preventive care and widespread use of antibiotics. They also grew up in a generally prosperous economy, and many benefitted from greater educational and employment opportunities compared with earlier generations.

The study’s authors said they chose to use the self-reported health (SRH) method to gather data because of how it reflects “baby boomer population’s diverse perceptions of aging and health, as well as the effect that these perceptions might have on their use of health care services.” As explained here by Joe Rojas-Burke on the AHCJ website, education, income and social status are key drivers in determining positive health outcomes.

Other factors that affect health include differences in experiences and outcomes for individuals born and growing up in different time periods, known as birth cohort effects. These may be unique to a particular generation or accumulate over the lifetime. In addition, “period effects” can arise from events that occur at a particular time or during a particular period and have the potential to affect people of all ages and birth cohorts. These can include introduction of new policies, technologies and health treatments, or more general societal changes such as greater educational opportunities, prosperity, or initiatives such as smoking cessation programs.

Researchers in the Milbank study found no evidence that the health of baby boomers is substantially different from that of the previous or succeeding cohorts, or that their need for health care would be greater or less than might be expected based on the size of this group. Rather, “SRH was almost counterbalanced by adverse health factors such as increasing BMI, resulting in no overall health improvements during the study’s (1994-2010) time frame.”

Although the U.S. and Canadian health systems have numerous differences (see this excellent comparison by Trudy Lieberman on the AHCJ website) — the most obvious being payment structure and availability — obesity remains a public health challenge among aging boomers in both countries. Obesity rates in Canada, the United States and other developed nations have increased over the past several decades, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). As this PBS Newshour story explains, obesity is one of the biggest threats to public health in developed countries and “increasingly so in emerging economies, especially in urban areas.” Canada, like the United States, conducts public health campaigns that target obesity, but efforts are aimed at the population as a whole, not specific groups.

As numerous studies show, obesity is linked to development and exacerbation of multiple chronic diseases such as diabetes and heart disease, may accelerate the overall aging process faster than smoking does, and is associated with higher incidence of morbidity and mortality, especially among older populations. However, the challenges of treating obesity in people over age 65 are plentiful.

As the Milbank study authors concluded, people in high-income countries such as Canada and the United States are living longer, but developing more chronic diseases and disabling conditions, such as cardiovascular disease, that often are obesity-related and affect quality of life. The study calls for more effectively targeted campaigns highlighting the effects of obesity and promoting healthy weight.


1 thought on “Today’s aging boomers may be less healthy elders than expected, study says

  1. Eileen Beal

    I think we need to stop lumping all Boomers into one pig-in-the-python group, cuz, to paraphrase NIA’s founder/long-time leader, Dr. Bob Butler, “when you have seen one old person (Boomer) you have seen one old person (Boomer).”

    In order to get real insight into how Boomers are aging we need to do comparison/contrast studies of Boomers who have excellent sociodemographic characteristics (high income, high educational attainment, excellent access to health care, etc.) with moderate sociodemographic characteristics (moderate levels of and/or access to the above) and low sociodemographic characteristics (little access to the above, plus the environmental challenges that come with living in low income neighborhoods).

    With that data in hand both journalists (and health care professionals) will be better able to cover (address) the pressing health/health care needs of the US’s skewing poorer and poorer population.

    Or, I hope they will, anyway.

    Eileen Beal, Cle OH

Leave a Reply