Tag Archives: surgical errors

Disclosure of hospital infections still in its infancy

On Forbes.com, Gergana Koleva evaluated the woeful state of national hospital-associated infection reporting, with the help of recently published research. As Koleva writes, such infections account for more than 8,000 deaths each year in the United States and add an estimated $10 billion in annual cost, and hospitals routinely collect valuable data on such things for internal use, yet no clear reporting standards exist on a national level.

The report … shows that only 21 states currently have legislation that requires monitoring and public reporting for surgical site infections. Of those, only eight states actually make the data publicly available, and only a total of 10 procedures – out of 250 possible types of surgeries – get reported.

And even many those states that reported some surgical infection rates as of late 2010 (Colorado, Massachussetts, Missouri, New York, Ohio, Oregon, South Carolina, and Vermont)

Continue reading

Fla. hospitals make little progress on error reduction

South Florida Sun Sentinel reporters Sally Kestin and Bob LaMendola report that, despite the myriad initiatives and protocols launched in the dozen years since a landmark report thrust medical errors into the headlines, little progress has been made in actually reducing the toll taken by medical errors.

“I don’t really see any improvement in patient safety,” said Dr. Arthur Palamara, a Hollywood vascular surgeon and advocate for safer practices. “Unfortunately, despite all the protocols that were put in place, the adverse incidents, the wrong-site surgeries still keep happening at the same rate.”

A long list of technological advances and a national emphasis on preventing mistakes “hasn’t made a difference,” said Douglas Dotan, chief executive of CRG Medical, a Houston firm that sets up error-prevention systems…

They found that, while some progress has been made, even the most aggressive hospitals have found it difficult to crack the exceeding complex web of human and mechanical interactions that make errors possible.

These findings, which have become a depressingly predictable event, are built in part on research published in the April, 2011 issue of Health Affairs, a publication to which AHCJ members are granted free access.

AHCJ resources on patient safety

“Never events” still happen sometimes

Photo by Garrett P. via Flickr

MedPage Today’s Crystal Phend drew two key lessons from a recent paper on the persistence of “never events,” particularly wrong-patient and wrong-site surgeries, in Colorado.

The first, drawn from an invited critique (subscription required), is that research often underestimates the frequency of never events because, like this study, they rely on self reporting and overly narrow definitions of the events in question. After all, it’s not wise to assume that folks are going to voluntarily link their name to a wrong-patient surgery.

The second is that attempts to prevent never events, such as the Joint Commission-required pre-surgery routine, don’t cast a wide enough net.

Nonsurgical specialists were just as likely to cause significant injury from wrong-site errors as those in the procedural specialties, who have gotten more of the focus (31.2% versus 30.8%, P=0.67).

That’s because, in their analysis, the researchers put the responsibility for wrong procedures at the step where things went wrong, Stahel told MedPage Today. And sometimes that’s before the cutting stage.

“In certain cases we realize that the harm is already done before the patient sets foot in the hospital,” he told MedPage Today.

“Strict adherence to the Universal Protocol must be expanded to nonsurgical specialties to achieve a zero-tolerance philosophy for these preventable incidents,” Stahel’s group wrote.

Reporters encounter hospital’s lack of transparency

Blythe Bernhard and Jeremy Kohler of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch investigated a string of serious mistakes at a local hospital and found the story of a 16-year-old girl who suffocated in a bean-bag chair after being sedated. It’s a remarkable and chilling story on its own and, as AHCJ Immediate Past President Trudy Lieberman points out, it’s made even more valuable for health journalists thanks to Kohler’s willingness to explain his investigative process.

Acting on multiple tips referring to a botched 2007 kidney removal, Kohler began the laborious process of triangulating the error. You should really take a minute to read his entire explanation, but if you really don’t have time, just take note that his path was something like this: Tips from sources -> Joint Commission -> Missouri Division of Insurance -> National Practitioner Data Bank -> Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services -> Missouri Board of Professional Registration for the Healing Arts -> The actual hospital.

And even then, he was unable to get clear confirmation that surgeons had removed the wrong kidney from a patient. Instead, the hospital cited privacy regulations.

Last week, officials with SSM Health Care, the St. Louis-based corporation that operates DePaul and several other hospitals, said they could not speak about specific patient cases because of federal privacy laws. “The desire to defend ourselves and paint an accurate and full picture does not outweigh our patients’ right to privacy,” they said in a statement.

Even a subject like this, which clearly involves what Kohler calls “information that patients in need of a surgeon would be interested in knowing,” the obstacles between readers and the truth about a “never event” appear insurmountable.

Hearst project looks at toll of medical mistakes

A team of reporters from Hearst news organizations across the country contributed to “Dead by Mistake,” a broad investigation into deaths caused by “preventable medical injuries,” of which the reporters estimate there are almost “200,000 per year in the United States.” A decade after a federal report challenged the medical community to halve the accidental death rate, the toll taken by medical mistakes has instead increased even further, the Hearst reporters found. Furthermore, reporters found that “the medical community, the federal government and most states have overwhelmingly failed to take the effective steps outlined in the report a decade ago.”

According to the report, the American Medical Association and American Hospital Association are partly to blame, as they have opposed any mandatory reporting of medical accident. Even in the 20 states that have implemented mandatory reporting rules, research indicates that only a small fraction of accidents are actually reported. Despite this “chaotic, dysfunctional patchwork,” the Obama administration is not supporting national mandatory reporting.

Cathleen Crowley and Eric Nalder’s centerpiece, which focuses on hospital reporting of mistakes, is an informative read for anyone interested in the availability of hospital safety data on national and local levels, both now and in the future.

The package as a whole includes local stories for Hearst markets including California, Texas, Washington, Connecticut and New York as well as a number of in-depth anecdotes and stories with a national scope.

Editor Phil Bronstein explains how the project was reported, including compiling and analyzing nine databases and conducting hundreds of interviews. The cross-platform project involved journalists from print, television reporters and the Web. BayNewser has a Q&A with Bronstein about how the project was done.