Health care reform: Litigation update

Share:

By Kenneth Jost, Supreme Court Editor, CQ Press, and Associate Editor, CQ Researcher
Jost on Justice

Five rulings to date on the merits in constitutional challenges to act:

Virginia ex rel. Cuccinelli v. Sebelius, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, 702 F.Supp. 598 (E.D. Va. 2010) [Dec. 13, 2010]; appeal to Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Nos. 11-1057, -1058; oral argument, May 10; petition for certiorari before judgment, U.S. Supreme Court, 10-1014; scheduled for conference, April 15; decision could be announced April18. (Fourth Circuit argument in tandem with Liberty University v. Geithner.)
Judge Henry Hudson ruled the law unconstitutional.

Thomas More Law Center v. Obama, 720 F.Supp. 882 (E.D. Mich. 2010) [Oct. 7, 2010], appeal to Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 10-2388; oral argument, June 1.
Judge George Steeh ruled the law constitutional.

Florida ex rel. Bondi v. U.S. Dep’t of Health and Human Services, 716 F.Supp. 2d 1120 (N.D. Fla. 2010) [Oct. 14, 2010]; injunction issued, Jan. 31, 2011; appeal to Eleventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 11-11021; cross-appeal, No. 11-11067; briefing due to be completed May 25; oral argument, June 8.
Judge Roger Vinson ruled the law unconstitutional.

Liberty University v. Geithner, Secretary of Treasury, 2010 WL 4860299, No. 6:10cv15 (W.D. Va. Nov. 30, 2010); appeal to Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 10-2347; oral argument, May 10 (in tandem with Virginia v. Sebelius).
Judge Norman Moon ruled the law constitutional.

Mead v. Holder, No. Civ.A 10-950 GK, 2011 WL 611139 (D.D.C. Feb. 22, 2011), on appeal sub nom Seven-Sky v. Holder, Attorney General, to U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 11-5047; oral argument, sometime in September.)
Judge Gladys Kessler ruled the law constitutional.

A comprehensive list with detailed information on roughly 20 cases can be found on the site “Health Care Lawsuits,” published by the conservative group Independent Women’s Forum:

Other Resources

Legal blogs that have been covering the litigation:

Organizations that have been following the litigation or the issues:

AARP: www.aarp.org

Alliance for Health Policy, www.allhealth.org

American Center for Law and Justice: www.aclj.org

Center for American Progress: http://www.americanprogress.org

National Federation of Independent Businesses: www.nfib.com

U.S. Chamber of Commerce: www.uschamber.com

Washington Legal Foundation: http://www.wlf.org/

White House: www.whitehouse.gov/blog/issues/Previous HitHealth-Care

Young Invincibles: www.younginvincibles.org

Health and medical organizations that have filed amicus briefs

American Academy of Pediatrics

American Association of People with Disabilities

American Cancer Society

American Hospital Association

American Nurses Association

America’s Health Insurance Plans

Association of American Physicians and Surgeons

Physician Hospitals of America

Law professors who have followed litigation closely, from opposite perspectives:

Randy Barnett, professor, Georgetown University Law Center
Believes law unconstitutional

Timothy Jost (no relation), Washington & Lee University School of Law
Believes law constitutional

AHCJ Staff

Share:

Tags: