Getting the dirt on the allergy epidemic #ahcj14

Sandra Jordan

About Sandra Jordan

Sandra Jordan is a health reporter at the St. Louis American. She attended Health Journalism 2014 as an AHCJ-Ethnic Media Health Journalism Fellow, a program supported by the Leona M. & Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust.

Erwin Gelfand, M.D., chair of pediatrics at National Jewish Health, talks about environmental and behavioral factors behind allergies

Photo: Pia Christensen Erwin Gelfand, M.D., chair of pediatrics at National Jewish Health, talks about environmental and behavioral factors behind allergies

Are there more people with allergies, allergic responses, asthma and eczema than in years past? Is the environment the blame? The short answer is yes and yes.  However, there are other factors involved.

The panel discussion at Health Journalism 2014, “The Dirt on the Allergy Epidemic,” focused on causes and prevention of eczema, asthma and food allergies in children.

Since allergies were not prevalent 60 years ago, Erwin Gelfand, M.D., chair of pediatrics at National Jewish Health, said the difference points to environmental and behavioral factors.

“There is no doubt that the incidence of allergic diseases has increased and it can almost be traced five to six decades ago,” Gelfand said. “And the big question is; what changed that allowed this to go on?”

Our genetic background is our susceptibility genes, he said.

First, an immune response is required in order to be allergic, Gelfand said.

“If you are born without an immune system, like the ‘bubble baby,’ you do not have the capacity to develop an allergy,” Gelfand said. “You need an immune system; so we have a trigger; it impacts the gene and environment interaction.

“The genetic background is stable; the environment background is a very dynamic and constantly changing influence.”

Gelfand said immune responses can be protective, to fight off viruses and fungal infections; or it can be a pro-allergic response, developing eczema, allergic rhinitis, hives and the like.

Experts want to drive the body’s immune response from one of reaction to calm acknowledgment.

“How can we drive the immune response to be one of tolerance, being able to see the foreign protein, being able to recognize it but not forming allergic response to that particular protein?” Gelfand said.

The age of onset when a person becomes sensitized and goes on to develop an allergic reaction is critical, Gelfand said, citing a study that indicated the incidence rates of asthma are in the earliest years. “We think that 70 to 80 percent of adult asthmatics can trace the origin of their disease to the first years of life,” Gelfand said. “And there’s a whole body of literature that says, even in utero, during pregnancy, the fetus may be exposed to certain things that condition their immune response to become a pro-allergic response as opposed to a protective response.”

Factors being studied include stress and psychological factors; vaccine and acetaminophen use, microbials and antibiotics, diet and folic acid supplementation for pregnant women.

“Every mother is given folic acid, often B12 and choline, and it’s turned around the incidence of spinal cord problems, spina bifida. But, on the other hand, folate, B12, choline – are so-called methyl-donors, and by methylating certain genes, we turn off certain functions,” Gelfand said. “By methylating the protective genes, maybe we have increased allergic disease.”

Gelfand referred to a study in Scandinavia, on mothers and their offspring and the incidence of having children with atopic diseases – asthma, allergic rhinitis and atopic dermatitis.

“In Scandinavia, they’ve associated the increase of allergic disease at the time folic acid supplementation was introduced,” Gelfand said. “An epidemiologic association – not cause and effect.”

Gelfand said researchers are studying pregnant mothers, their diet throughout time and methylation.

“We have now identified 64 genes that are differentially methylated in the high-risk mothers vs. the low-risk mothers that transmitted to their offspring.”

In contrast, Mark Holbreich, M.D., a diplomate of the American Board of Allergy and Immunology, who specializes in pediatric and adult allergy and asthma in Indianapolis, Indiana, discussed studies on Amish farm communities. The Amish work and live off the land, shun motorized vehicles and other modern conveniences. Holbreich said a study of Swiss farm children indicates that allergy incidence is very low among the Amish.

“Only 7 percent had allergies, which is the lowest reported prevalence of allergic disease of any population within a westernized country that’s ever been reported.” Holbreich said.

Amish pregnant mothers drink raw milk from their cows. Researchers suspect cow exposure offers a rich microbial environment – hay, manure, etc.; barn exposure for children and mothers, along with drinking the raw milk, that factor into desensitization.

“There is something about the milk that we don’t understand yet,” Holbreich said. “Raw milk is not safe… If you don’t grow up with your mother drinking raw milk when you are pregnant and you end up drinking raw milk – it is a dangerous thing.”

For years, doctors have been advising parents to hold off on introducing certain foods like milk, soy, eggs and peanuts, because of the potential for allergic reaction. Panelists say that old advice has been re-evaluated to introduce foods sooner.

Gideon Lack, M.D., professor of pediatric allergy at Kings College London, explained the dual exposure hypothesis around eczema and food allergy in children. The theory suggests exposure through the disturbed skin leads to allergic sensitization, while oral exposure to food allergens promote tolerance.

“In English speaking countries, there’s been a doubling to tripling of peanut allergies,” Lack said. “In the UK, there is an EpiPen self-injectable device in just about every classroom, so this really has become an epidemic.”

To eat or not to eat allergenic foods – when to eat them, how to eat them, how much, how frequently, if should it be done at the same time as breastfeeding or afterward –there are very few evidence-based guidelines on how to feed our children, Lack said.

Dan Atkins, M.D., associate professor of pediatrics and section head of Allergy at Children’s Hospital Colorado, said a careful history is important to identifying the reaction to the allergy, whether it is a toxic, metabolic, pharmacologic or other reaction.

“We’re trying to decide if the immune system plays a role in production of the reaction or not. If it doesn’t, we label that it a food intolerance. We go through what they need to do to avoid that food,” Atkins said.

If the immune system is involved, the next thing doctors try to decide is whether it is an IgE mediated reaction or not, he explained. Skin testing or blood tests for IgE serum may determine which foods trigger the reactions. IgE-mediated allergic triggers are in food proteins.

“One of the problems is, we can’t determine yet, who is going to have severe reaction yet without a history of exposure,” Atkins said.

On the other hand, there are children who have IgE response but can eat certain foods that don’t prompt a clinical reaction. “You have to combine the history of exposure, the reaction after, with a positive skin test and a positive blood test or you can remove too many foods from a kid’s diet,” Atkins said.

He said food avoidance needs to be taught, through consultation of a dietician.

The food challenge, which exposes children to food allergens in a closely monitored clinical setting is safe and accurate, if done properly by persons experienced in them, Atkins said.

Regarding children using food to bully allergic children, Atkins said, “We’ve got all of these kids running around and they are afraid they will die from minor exposure, and that’s unfair.” He said physicians need to do a better job of teaching children about risk and day-to-day casual exposure.

Related

A couple of the doctors on the panel have said they are available for follow-up interviews:

  • Dr. Dan Atkins, chief, allergy section, Children’s Hospital Colorado. For interviews, please contact assistant: Ebony Jones at 720-777-0610 or ebony.jones@childrenscolorado.org.
  • Dr. Mark Holbreich, allergist from Indianapolis. He welcomes emails directly to him at mholbreich@comcast.net or calls on his mobile number at: 317-372-4801.
  • For Dr. Erwin Gelfand, chief of pediatrics at National Jewish, please contact the media relations staff:
  • William Allstetter, director, media & external relations (303-398-1002 office, 720-987-6654 mobile, allstetterw@njhealth.org)
  • Adam Dormuth, media relations specialist, health, medicine and science (303-398-1082 office, 970-222-5034 mobile, dormutha@njhealth.org)

One thought on “Getting the dirt on the allergy epidemic #ahcj14

  1. Laura Henze Russell

    eveloped late onset allergies to just about everything, thanks to mercury poisoning from my dental fillings ruining my gut lining, and causing massive overgrowth of yeast in my body. Earlier I was allergic to sulfa drugs. Now I cannot tolerate sugar, dairuly, gluten, vinegar,/alcohol and more without itchy rashes.

    This is not rocket science. Until we stop giving the ADA and FDA a free pass on a dangerous neurotoxin that offgasses in quantities damaging to people with common methylation and detox pathway defects,we can kiss our health goodbye. Allergies are the least of the problems that result.

    When healthcare journalists look behind the curtain and find the ADA Wizard of Oz in the white coat, perhaps we can catch up with other nations who ban or restrict amalgam in increasing numbers to protect the health of genetically susceptible children and adults. Let’s invite editors and doctors to do the same. Biologic dentists already get it, and their practices are thriving and their patients, getting healthier again.

Comments are closed.