Tag Archives: pre-existing conditions

Potential pros, cons of those short-term health plans

About Joanne Kenen

Joanne Kenen, (@JoanneKenen) the health editor at Politico, has been AHCJ’s topic leader on health reform and curated related material at healthjournalism.org. Follow her on Facebook.

As promised, the Trump administration has released a proposed rule to allow short-term health insurance plans that do not conform to all of the Affordable Care Act’s requirements. The Department of Health and Human Services says it’s necessary to give consumers access to more affordable insurance options; many backers of the ACA say it will further undermine already wobbly ACA markets and leave people with inadequate protections in the case of a serious, costly health problem.

So what is a “short-term plan?” Continue reading

Health care repeal bill would have dealt death blow to ‘essential health benefits’

About Joanne Kenen

Joanne Kenen, (@JoanneKenen) the health editor at Politico, has been AHCJ’s topic leader on health reform and curated related material at healthjournalism.org. Follow her on Facebook.

A variety of fixes aimed at appeasing resistant conservative House members failed to save the GOP’s Affordable Care Act repeal bill, which was pulled from consideration late Friday.

Among last-minute changes to the GOP’s proposed American Health Care Act (ACHA) was language that would have repealed 10 so-called “essential health benefits” in the individual market, letting states decided which mandates they wanted. Continue reading

Is reform adequately serving people in your area with pre-existing conditions?

About Joanne Kenen

Joanne Kenen, (@JoanneKenen) the health editor at Politico, has been AHCJ’s topic leader on health reform and curated related material at healthjournalism.org. Follow her on Facebook.

This post is about high risk pools, so let’s get some confusing semantics out of the way.

The Affordable Care Act created special pre-existing condition insurance pools (known as PCIP).  But many states already had high risk pools. The older state-based high risk pools (sometimes called legacy pools) still exist … but to further complicate matters, the health law gave states the option of running their own PCIP or having the feds do it. So some states have two state-run pools:  one “high risk” and one “PCIP.” Some states have a “high risk” and the feds run the “PCIP.” And some states don’t run a high risk pools so they only have a PCIP – which either they run, or the federal government runs.  Got all that?

What questions do you have about health reform and how to cover it?

Joanne KenenJoanne Kenen is AHCJ’s health reform topic leader. She is writing blog posts, tip sheets, articles and gathering resources to help our members cover the complex implementation of health reform. If you have questions or suggestions for future resources on the topic, please send them to joanne@healthjournalism.org.

When the health care law passed last year, it included $5 billion for temporary insurance pools for uninsured people with pre-existing conditions.  The widespread expectation was that the uninsured would rush to enroll, blowing through the $5 billion long before 2014, when the pools were supposed to shut down as national reform kicked in.  Once the state exchanges are up and running, the uninsured will be able to buy coverage that way (with subsidies if they qualify based on income) and can’t be turned down because of pre-existing conditions or high-risk.

The conventional wisdom was wrong; enrollment in the pools was a trickle, not a flood.  HHS has twice  – once last fall and once just a few weeks ago – announced steps to bring down premium costs and streamline enrollment. The pace of enrollment has picked up a bit, but it’s still just about 20,000. That’s total, nationwide. (The health insurance law gave states the option of running the pre-existing pool, or having the federal government do it. Either way the feds fund it, with participants also paying premiums.)

The main barrier, of course, is cost – premiums in the pools are high. And people have to be uninsured for six months to get into the pre-existing condition pools. That means people who have decided to pony up for the older state high risk pools (which exist in 35 states and were created long before health reform) aren’t going to drop coverage and go without for six months so they can get into these newer federally funded pools, even if the new ones are less expensive.

The states running the pools, as well as their federal partners, have begun trying to do more outreach. In one little-noticed provision, HHS this fall will start paying insurance agents and brokers for connecting eligible uninsured people with the program.

Is any of this outreach happening in your state? Is it visible? How are people hearing – or not hearing – about the pools. Why are they staying uninsured rather than going into the pools. Obviously cost is a factor – but is anything else at play?  Is the outreach adequate? What are the misperceptions?  What is the psychology? Are they just crossing their fingers and hoping they don’t get sick, or are they assuming they can get free or charity care in the ER in a crunch? Are they going to community health clinics rather than pay the high cost of the pools?

To learn more about high risk pools, here are some resources.