Tag Archives: medicaid

New tip sheet breaks down how ACA applies to immigrants

Joanne Kenen

About Joanne Kenen

Joanne Kenen, (@JoanneKenen) the health editor at Politico, is AHCJ’s topic leader on health reform and curates related material at healthjournalism.org. She welcomes questions and suggestions on health reform resources and tip sheets at joanne@healthjournalism.org.

We’ve posted a tip sheet from the National Immigration Law Center on how the Affordable Care Act affects immigrants. They let us put their guide on the  site with one request – that we include their website and suggest that you check their site if you write on this topic in case there are updates.

There’s no sense in repeating what you can find on the tip sheet (undocumented immigrants don’t get covered, documented ones do under  the circumstances described – generally, they can go in the exchanges with subsidies if they qualify but still face a wait to get into Medicaid). But it is worth addressing the nexis between the health law and the current debate over helping immigrants become documented.

The bill will go through changes before it passes – IF it passes (a big question mark, particularly in the House). But the key message from our perspective as health reporters: Given what’s been said so far by Democrats and Republicans alike, it is highly unlikely that undocumented immigrants will get health benefits WHILE they are going through what looks to be a multi-year process of becoming documented. However, once they are documented they will be treated like the rest of the documented immigrant population.

R.I. program provides care outside hospitals in effort to reduce ER use

Pia Christensen

About Pia Christensen

Pia Christensen (@AHCJ_Pia) is the managing editor/online services for AHCJ. She manages the content and development of healthjournalism.org, coordinates social media efforts of AHCJ and assists with the editing and production of association guides, programs and newsletters.

Emergency department

Photo by KOMUnews via Flickr

Using community health workers to work with frequent emergency room visitors is showing some success in reducing ER use.

The latest installment of “Cost of Diabetes,” a yearlong series by Rhiannon Meyers of the Corpus Christi (Texas) Caller-Times, looks at what Rhode Island is doing to help prevent and manage diabetes.

A “Communities of Care” program pairs peer navigators, who are community health workers, with Medicaid patients who are seen in an emergency room four or more times in a year. The peer navigators “try to figure out why [the patients] keep going to the emergency room and help them access resources they need, from housing to transportation to doctors’ appointments. The peer navigators also continuously check in with patients to make sure they are seeing the doctor as needed and taking their prescriptions to avoid unnecessary hospitalizations.”

Officials at UnitedHealthcare, which contracts with Rhode Island Medicaid, say they’ve seen a 30 percent decrease in ER use and have possibly saved up to $600,000, according to preliminary results. And those results are prompting people to look at the program as a model, said Dr. Rene Rulin, medical director of Rhode Island Medicaid at UnitedHealthcare.

(Hat tip to Keldy Ortiz.)

States yank dental benefits, leaving low-income adults in hole

Mary Otto

About Mary Otto

Mary Otto, a Washington, D.C.-based freelancer, is AHCJ's topic leader on oral health, curating related material at healthjournalism.org. She welcomes questions and suggestions on oral health resources at mary@healthjournalism.org.

The photo of the man sitting in a dental chair, cradling his hurting face, drew me right into the San Francisco Chronicle story.

Reported by staff writer Drew Joseph, the Jan. 31 article took a thoughtful – and painful – look at the shortage of dental care for California adults.

“Jabari Kelly showed up at San Francisco General Hospital’s dental clinic last Friday looking like he was hiding a golf ball in his left cheek. He had been in pain for three weeks.

“The 36-year-old San Francisco man had an infected wisdom tooth, and swelling had spread into his jaw and cheek. A few more days, he was told, and the infection could have advanced below his chin, possibly restricting his breathing,” Joseph wrote.

“You’ve got 32 teeth – each one can kill you,” Newton Gordon, D.D.S., of the UCSF School of Dentistry, told Joseph. Continue reading

Story highlights parents affected by state decision on Medicaid expansion

Joanne Kenen

About Joanne Kenen

Joanne Kenen, (@JoanneKenen) the health editor at Politico, is AHCJ’s topic leader on health reform and curates related material at healthjournalism.org. She welcomes questions and suggestions on health reform resources and tip sheets at joanne@healthjournalism.org.

Ron Jackson of Oklahoma Watch wrote one of the best stories I’ve seen laying out the policy dimensions and the human face of the decision by some states to forgo Medicaid expansion.

Joanne Kenen

Joanne Kenen (@JoanneKenen) is AHCJ’s health reform topic leader. If you have questions or suggestions for future resources, please send them to joanne@healthjournalism.org.

You’ll recall, of course, that when the Supreme Court upheld the Affordable Care Act it made the Medicaid expansion a state option, not a requirement.

That created an anomaly that the law’s authors did not intend: People with incomes at the poverty level and up to four times the poverty level (roughly $92,000 for a family of four) will be able to get subsidized insurance in the state-based health exchanges starting in 2014.  But people who are poorer than that – who are below the poverty level and who are not now eligible for Medicaid in their state (which is way more restrictive than most people imagine) won’t get subsidies.

If their state doesn’t expand Medicaid, they get nothing.

Oklahoma is among the states rejecting the coverage expansion – saying it will leave them on the hook for untold millions of dollars, even though the federal government has promised to pick up the full cost for three years and 90 percent over the long haul.

Jackson described what that means to “tens of thousands of low-income parents.” Continue reading

Free dental services try to help the uninsured

Mary Otto

About Mary Otto

Mary Otto, a Washington, D.C.-based freelancer, is AHCJ's topic leader on oral health, curating related material at healthjournalism.org. She welcomes questions and suggestions on oral health resources at mary@healthjournalism.org.

Most Americans probably enjoyed a good meal or two during the holidays.

But staying well-nourished, let alone enjoying food, are challenges for people suffering from untreated dental disease.

Photo by “wistechcolleges” at Flickr.com.

A dental practice, based in Savannah, Ga., and South Carolina has made it a tradition to offer free dental care on the Friday before Thanksgiving, as Raquel Rodriquez reported for WSAV-Savannah, Ga.

The report by Rodriquez, “Brighter Smiles Thanks to Free Dental Services,” opened with footage of a long line of people waiting in the early morning for care from Howard Family Dental.

For poor adults, obtaining dental care has been an enduring problem. But images of such lines have become increasingly familiar since the economy slumped.

One of the dentists reminded Rodriquez that, in tough economic times, dental care sometimes gets delayed because of cost.

“A lot of small businesses can no longer afford to offer that benefit for their employees so a lot of people have lost their insurance even if they have a job and so many people have become unemployed that they no longer have insurance at all,” Dr. Julie Howard told her.

Rodriquez also spoke with patient James Kellogg, who came for a tooth extraction. He told her that his tooth had been bothering him for six months but when money is tight other expenses come first.

Mary OttoMary Otto, AHCJ’s topic leader on oral health is writing blog posts, editing tip sheets and articles and gathering resources to help our members cover oral health care.

If you have questions or suggestions for future resources on the topic, please send them to mary@healthjournalism.org.

“When you got different priorities like taking care of your home life and stuff like that you try to put your pain on the back burner but there’s a point where you have to take care of it,” Kellogg said.

Poor adults are not entitled to dental care under Medicaid. Adult dental benefits are considered optional and vary from state to state, making them vulnerable to cuts during economic downturns.

Safety-net clinics located in Federally Qualified Health Centers, community health centers, dental schools and state and local health departments offer care to 7 or 8 million Americans, far short of the estimated 80 to 100 million Americans who need it, according to the Institute of Medicine.

Free weekend clinics such as those organized by nonprofits such as the Remote Area Medical Foundation and Mission of Mercy in communities across the country draw crowds of people in need of care.  But organizers acknowledge that charity care alone cannot fix the system.

“Lack of resources to pay for dental services, either through dental insurance or out-of-pocket, is a major barrier to oral health care for many low-income Americans. The problem is particularly acute for low-income adults, who are more likely to be uninsured than low-income children,” observed the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured in an oral health policy brief published in the summer.

If you find yourself covering one of these events, the paper, which offers data and analysis of the problem could be a valuable resource for you.

Cost of long-term care merits coverage, discussion

Judith Graham

About Judith Graham

Judith Graham (@judith_graham), a Colorado-based freelancer, is AHCJ’s topic leader on aging, and as such curates related material at healthjournalism.org. She welcomes questions and suggestions on aging issue resources and tip sheets at judith@healthjournalism.org.

With the baby boomers aging into Medicare and heading into years when physical decline and disability gradually become more common, one thing seems certain: Long-term care will inevitably become a much more important topic of national discussion in the years ahead.

Judith GrahamJudith Graham (@judith_graham), AHCJ’s topic leader on aging, is writing blog posts, editing tip sheets and articles and gathering resources to help our members cover the many issues around our aging society.

If you have questions or suggestions for future resources on the topic, please send them to judith@healthjournalism.org.

Two recent articles underscore the point. One is by Stuart Butler, director of the Center for Policy Innovations at the Heritage Foundation, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank. The other is by William Galston, a senior fellow in the governance studies program at the Brookings Institution, another think tank in the nation’s capital.

Both argue that a long-term care crisis is at hand and will only grow in scope as the baby boomers swell the ranks of older people who need assistance with household tasks (bill paying, shopping, cleaning), personal care (bathing, dressing, toileting) and custodial care.

“The growing cost of long-term care (LTC) is fast becoming a problem we can no longer ignore,” Butler writes. Continue reading

Webcast explores aging adults’ contributions, widening disparities, creating ‘synthetic families’

Judith Graham

About Judith Graham

Judith Graham (@judith_graham), a Colorado-based freelancer, is AHCJ’s topic leader on aging, and as such curates related material at healthjournalism.org. She welcomes questions and suggestions on aging issue resources and tip sheets at judith@healthjournalism.org.

You don’t often hear about how much older adults contribute to society. That’s a shame.

It allows the aging of American to be portrayed as a story of dependency: the reliance of the old upon the young. Instead, the truth is that the generations are inter-dependent, each benefiting the other.

Toni Antonucci
Antonucci

S. Jay Olshansky
Olshansky

Julie M. Zissimopoulos
Zissimopoulos

This was one of the themes articulated during AHCJ’s recent webcast with three members of the MacArthur Network on an Aging Society, a group of prominent academics exploring the opportunities as well as the challenges associated Americans’ increased life spans.

Julie Zissimopoulos, associate director of the Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics at the University of Southern California, described a framework for understanding how much support older adults get and how much they give in turn. (Resources and PowerPoint presentations from the webcast are available here.)

In the “here’s what they get” column, she put government health programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, Social Security, benefits from the department of Veterans Affairs, food stamps, programs supported through the Older Americans Act, and informal caregiving, largely from children and spouses, among other smaller items.

Total that up and it comes to $916 billion in public expenditures for older Americans in 2010.

In the “here’s what they give” column, Zissimopoulos included income taxes (federal and state), payroll taxes and property taxes that older adults pay, gifts and inheritances that they pass on to family and friends, the informal care they provide to spouses, elderly parents and children, and the many hours they spend volunteering, among other items.

Total that up and it comes to $646 billion in contributions by older Americans, also in 2010.

The difference, $316 billion, is a lot of money but by no means the enormous, out-of-proportion give-away portrayed by some. And the reality is all of society shares an interest in controlling health care costs, the largest item in the “debit” column for older adults.

Another theme of the web chat revolved around one of the greatest achievements of the 20th century – the extension of the human life span by more than 30 years, largely because of improvements in public health as well as advances in science and medicine. Continue reading

Focus on Medicaid as budget debates escalate

Judith Graham

About Judith Graham

Judith Graham (@judith_graham), a Colorado-based freelancer, is AHCJ’s topic leader on aging, and as such curates related material at healthjournalism.org. She welcomes questions and suggestions on aging issue resources and tip sheets at judith@healthjournalism.org.

Don’t forget about Medicaid as the budget debate occupies center stage in Washington.

Howard Gleckman reminds us why this is so important in a chock-full-of-data blog post at Forbes. I give Gleckman a boatload of credit. He’s one of the few reporters who consistently writes about vulnerable older people – a population that gets far too little attention.

Judith GrahamJudith Graham (@judith_graham), AHCJ’s topic leader on aging, is writing blog posts, editing tip sheets and articles and gathering resources to help our members cover the many issues around our aging society.

If you have questions or suggestions for future resources on the topic, please send them to judith@healthjournalism.org.

Among the key points in his post: Two-thirds of Medicaid budgets are spent on frail older people and young people with disabilities. One-third of budgets, about $120 billion in total, goes to long-term care.

Older people covered by Medicaid are poor and, many of them, dependent and chronically ill. About 9 million people known as “dual eligibles” are covered by Medicaid and Medicare, and this is a very vulnerable population, Gleckman observes:

According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, one-quarter of elderly who are eligible for both programs need assistance with at least three activities of daily living (such as bathing, going to the bathroom, eating, or dressing). Many are, in other words, helpless.

“Among the 1 million dual eligibles who are the most costly Medicaid patients, nearly half are aged 80 or older, three-quarters need help with 3 or more activities of daily living, three-quarters live in institutions, and one out of every six has Alzheimer’s.”

“Ninety percent are poor or near-poor. More than half have incomes of less than $10,000.”

Many politicians discussing cuts don’t really understand how Medicaid works or who it covers, Gleckman notes. You can be sure this is as true of your state legislators as it is of those in Congress. Continue reading

Panelists: Watch state activities for stories about seniors’ health services

Judith Graham

About Judith Graham

Judith Graham (@judith_graham), a Colorado-based freelancer, is AHCJ’s topic leader on aging, and as such curates related material at healthjournalism.org. She welcomes questions and suggestions on aging issue resources and tip sheets at judith@healthjournalism.org.

What lies ahead for Medicare now that election results are in?

Two words sum up the short-term outlook:  cost cutting.

Judith GrahamJudith Graham (@judith_graham), AHCJ’s topic leader on aging, is writing blog posts, editing tip sheets and articles and gathering resources to help our members cover the many issues around our aging society.

If you have questions or suggestions for future resources on the topic, please send them to judith@healthjournalism.org.

Down the road, a more ambitious and difficult task awaits: restructuring the program and realigning its incentives to create a lower-cost, higher quality, more sustainable health care system.

What isn’t on the horizon is a radical overhaul of Medicare along the lines that the Republicans proposed. Converting Medicare to a premium-support model isn’t going to happen, at least not any time in the foreseeable future.

Just after the election, AHCJ asked three distinguished experts – Karen Davis of the Commonwealth Fund, Joseph Antos of the American Enterprise Institute and John Rother of the National Coalition on Health Care – to weigh in on the outlook for health programs that serve seniors. Medicare held center stage during most of that web chat.

All three experts said that traditional Medicare isn’t sustainable and that a top priority should be reimbursement reforms that shift the program away from “paying for volume” to “paying for value.”

Although Medicare spending per capita has slowed, total spending will soar as tens of millions of baby boomers become eligible for the program, putting intense pressure on the federal budget, said Davis, president of the Commonwealth Fund.

Core Topics
Health Reform
Aging
Oral Health
Other Topics

With a 27 percent cut in Medicare reimbursement for physicians due to go into effect in January, the most immediate task for legislators is averting that, panelists agreed.

Next will come dealing with the “fiscal cliff” (a package of automatic tax hikes and spending cuts) that could throw the country into another recession, according to the panel. While an end-of-the-year deadline looms, that will surely be extended into next year, the panelists predicted.

“A key issue is whether Medicare and entitlement reform” will be part of these “fiscal cliff” discussions, Davis said. “Short term savings” in Medicare above and beyond those already proposed by the administration will likely be a focus, suggested Rother, president of the National Coalition on Health Care.

(President Obama had previously announced plans to cut projected increases in Medicare spending by $716 billion over a 10 year period. That’s now a floor for cuts that will be upcoming.) Continue reading

Health reform news looks at exchanges, Medicaid expansion decisions

Pia Christensen

About Pia Christensen

Pia Christensen (@AHCJ_Pia) is the managing editor/online services for AHCJ. She manages the content and development of healthjournalism.org, coordinates social media efforts of AHCJ and assists with the editing and production of association guides, programs and newsletters.

ProPublica’s Tracy Weber and Charles Ornstein, also AHCJ’s president, lay out in maps how various health reform mandates will play out and which states will participate. They find that “The maps here show the lack of consensus on two key parts of the act: Creating insurance exchanges and expanding Medicaid.” By Nov. 16, states have to submit plans to create an insurance exchange or decide to have the federal government run the exchange.

Jason Millman of Politico writes about the looming deadline to set up exchanges and decide whether to accept an expansion of Medicaid.” So far, just 13 states and the District of Columbia have told HHS they plan to control their own exchange.” Millman reports that many questions about implementation remain to be answered: “Leading up to the election, the Obama administration has sat on key rules governing exchanges, the benefits that health plans must cover, employer requirements and the Medicaid expansion.“

The Associated Press’ Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar details which states are on track to set up their own exchanges, which have decided not to do so and which states are planning to expand Medicaid programs. He reports that Republicans are asking for cuts to the health care law or money-saving delays in its implementation but Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., says that isn’t likely: “I think Democrats are increasingly emboldened about the health care act,” Daschle said. “The president won re-election partly by defending it. There is a new dynamic around the health care effort.”

AHCJ webcastFor more about what to watch for in state’s decisions on exchanges, as well as decisions on essential benefits packages and Medicaid expansion, see the AHCJ webcast “The state countdown: Fate of exchanges after the election.“ Moderated by AHCJ health reform topic leader, it featured three experts who are doing hands-on work in the states.

Update: Kaiser Health News’ Daily Report features a number of articles forecasting the next steps in health reform implementation and activities in various states.