Category Archives: Oral health

Campaign strives to improve access to care; critics say ADA misses mark

Mary Otto

About Mary Otto

Mary Otto, a Washington, D.C.-based freelancer, is AHCJ's topic leader on oral health, curating related material at healthjournalism.org. She welcomes questions and suggestions on oral health resources at mary@healthjournalism.org.

Give Kids a Smile event

Photo by um.dentistry via Flickr

Advocates for the poor and uninsured have worked long and hard to bring attention to the shortage of dental care for millions of Americans.  On Wednesday, the American Dental Association weighed in on the problem too, announcing a nationwide campaign designed to respond to address what leaders called the nation’s “dental crisis.”

“We’ve made great progress with each generation enjoying better dental health than the one before,” ADA President Robert Faiella, D.M.D., noted. “But there is still a dangerous divide in America between those with good dental health and those without. Our mission is to close that divide. Good oral health isn’t a luxury – it’s essential.”

Yet many go without that care.

While a vast majority of middle- and upper-income Americans reported good access to dental services, nearly half of lower-income adults said they had not seen a dentist in a year or more, according to a Harris poll released by the ADA as part of the campaign’s launch. The poll also found that poor Americans are more than two times as likely to be toothless than their wealthier counterparts and that low-income adults were far more likely to seek last-resort care in emergency rooms than their better-off counterparts. Continue reading

Dentists warn of risk in cleaning pacifiers with saliva

Mary Otto

About Mary Otto

Mary Otto, a Washington, D.C.-based freelancer, is AHCJ's topic leader on oral health, curating related material at healthjournalism.org. She welcomes questions and suggestions on oral health resources at mary@healthjournalism.org.

Dental folks collectively caught their breath when they heard about the study, just published in the journal Pediatrics.

The findings: Children whose parents “cleaned” dropped pacifers by sucking on them were less likely to have asthma or eczema at 18 months than children whose parents did not use this particular method.

In a May 6 story for National Public Radio, reporter Rob Stein explained the findings. He started out by talking with a typical mom who described washing her child’s pacifier when he dropped it, even cleaning it in boiling water if it fell “somewhere particularly gross.”

But, then Stein went on to say “there’s a theory that says: That may not be the best way to go. That sterilizing that pacifier may actually have a big downside. To try to find out, Bill Hesselmar, of the University of Gothenburg in Sweden, and his colleagues, studied 184 babies who used pacifiers and their parents. Continue reading

Coverage of Tulsa dental clinics’ violations has been cautious

Mary Otto

About Mary Otto

Mary Otto, a Washington, D.C.-based freelancer, is AHCJ's topic leader on oral health, curating related material at healthjournalism.org. She welcomes questions and suggestions on oral health resources at mary@healthjournalism.org.

Health officials in Oklahoma are working to test patients of two dental clinics for hepatitis and HIV, after an inspection turned up lax sanitation practices and other violations of the state’s Dental Act.

Shannon Muchmore

Shannon Muchmore

Shannon Muchmore of The Tulsa World has been covering the story, which has gone on to get worldwide coverage, with a steady stream of stories for the past month.

While getting out the latest news, offering descriptions of the lines of people waiting to get tested and exploring the fears of some of the 7,000 patients who state officials say may have been exposed – including one man who believes he contracted HIV while getting a tooth extracted at one of the clinics – Muchmore also has been careful to sound a cautionary note about the intricacies of tracing the bloodborne diseases back to their source. Continue reading

Despite ADA’s stance, dentists praise use of therapists

Mary Otto

About Mary Otto

Mary Otto, a Washington, D.C.-based freelancer, is AHCJ's topic leader on oral health, curating related material at healthjournalism.org. She welcomes questions and suggestions on oral health resources at mary@healthjournalism.org.

Photo by U.S. Pacific Fleet via Flickr

In spite of fierce opposition by some mainstream dental groups, workforce auxiliaries known as dental therapists are now at work in Minnesota.

And two dentists who work with them are attesting to their abilities in new YouTube videos, released by the Pew Charitable Trusts.

In one, John T. Powers, D.D.S., a private-practice dentist in Montevideo, Minn., says that working with a dental therapist has helped him expand access to care in his rural town. The therapist, trained to perform procedures including pulpotomies, extractions and to place stainless steel crowns has freed him to do more time consuming and complex procedures, Powers says.

In a second, Shiraz Asif, D.D.S., clinic dental officer at a community health clinic in Minneapolis, also describes the perks of working with therapists.

“They’ve turned out to be a great help,” Asif says.

These will surely not be the last words on the subject. Continue reading

Industry group concerned parents may drop dental coverage

Mary Otto

About Mary Otto

Mary Otto, a Washington, D.C.-based freelancer, is AHCJ's topic leader on oral health, curating related material at healthjournalism.org. She welcomes questions and suggestions on oral health resources at mary@healthjournalism.org.

Once the ACA covers children's dental care, will parents drop their dental insurance?

Photo by ianus via Flickr

An estimated 5.3 million children are expected to get dental coverage next year through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

But will up to 11 million parents decide to drop their own dental benefits when their kids get covered separately?

It’s one of the still-unanswered questions surrounding the health care reform law and it worries Evelyn Ireland, executive director of the National Association of Dental Plans, the trade association representing the dental benefits industry.

The problem is this, according to Ireland: Continue reading

Funding a critical issue in strengthening oral health #ahcj13

Sarah Janssen

About Sarah Janssen

Sarah Janssen is an education reporter at The Journal Gazette (Fort Wayne, Ind.). She is attending Health Journalism 2013 on an AHCJ-Healthier Beat Fellowship, which is supported by the Leona M. & Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust.

Often overlooked in overall health is the importance of oral health. But 100 million Americans lack dental benefits, and in 2009, there were 830,000 emergency room visits for preventable dental problems.

Robert Faiella, president of the American Dental Association, said awareness of oral health’s importance isn’t enough, but he said the environment is changing with the help of community and state-level initiatives such as hospitals referring patients to local dentists.

Faiella was part of a panel titled “Can states strengthen oral health?” at Health Journalism 2013.

He also showed a video about an ADA initiative to add community dental health coordinators to the dental workforce. Dental health coordinators first go through 18 months of training, then help people navigate the oral health system, find transportation and address language barriers.

Joining Faiella on the panel were Mary Foley, executive director of Medicaid-CHIP State Dental Association, and Mark Nehring, chair of the Department of Public Health and Community Service at Tufts School of Dental Medicine. Continue reading

States yank dental benefits, leaving low-income adults in hole

Mary Otto

About Mary Otto

Mary Otto, a Washington, D.C.-based freelancer, is AHCJ's topic leader on oral health, curating related material at healthjournalism.org. She welcomes questions and suggestions on oral health resources at mary@healthjournalism.org.

The photo of the man sitting in a dental chair, cradling his hurting face, drew me right into the San Francisco Chronicle story.

Reported by staff writer Drew Joseph, the Jan. 31 article took a thoughtful – and painful – look at the shortage of dental care for California adults.

“Jabari Kelly showed up at San Francisco General Hospital’s dental clinic last Friday looking like he was hiding a golf ball in his left cheek. He had been in pain for three weeks.

“The 36-year-old San Francisco man had an infected wisdom tooth, and swelling had spread into his jaw and cheek. A few more days, he was told, and the infection could have advanced below his chin, possibly restricting his breathing,” Joseph wrote.

“You’ve got 32 teeth – each one can kill you,” Newton Gordon, D.D.S., of the UCSF School of Dentistry, told Joseph. Continue reading

Hispanic children bear brunt of poor access to dental care

Mary Otto

About Mary Otto

Mary Otto, a Washington, D.C.-based freelancer, is AHCJ's topic leader on oral health, curating related material at healthjournalism.org. She welcomes questions and suggestions on oral health resources at mary@healthjournalism.org.

The lack of dental care is a big problem for children living below the poverty level and untreated tooth decay hits Hispanic children particularly hard.

Data from one large national survey found a full 26 percent of Hispanic 6- to 9-year olds suffered from untreated tooth decay, compared with 14 percent of non-Hispanic white children of the same age.

February is National Children’s Dental Health Month and oral health advocates from the Maryland Dental Action Coalition just launched a new campaign, Dientes Sanos, Ninos Sanos, (Healthy Teeth, Healthy Children) tailored to reach more of the state’s at-risk kids.

“This started because Hispanic children have more tooth decay than other populations, said Harry Goodman, D.M.D., M.P.H., director of the Office of Oral Health at the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. He stopped by the Prince George’s County Health Department dental clinic on Feb. 1 to help kick off the effort. It expands on a statewide English-language oral health literacy initiative and includes Spanish language posters for bus and train shelters, brochures, a series of radio spots and a website, DientesSanosNinosSanos.org aimed at raising oral health literacy and helping Spanish-speaking parents find dental care for their children. Continue reading

Dental problems sending more patients to hospitals

Mary Otto

About Mary Otto

Mary Otto, a Washington, D.C.-based freelancer, is AHCJ's topic leader on oral health, curating related material at healthjournalism.org. She welcomes questions and suggestions on oral health resources at mary@healthjournalism.org.

Toothaches have sent increasing numbers of poor and uninsured people to emergency rooms nationwide, according to a federal report.

In 2009, more than 900,000 emergency department visits and nearly 13,000 hospital inpatient stays were related to dental conditions, according to a statistical brief from the U.S. Department of Human Services’ Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Between 2006 and 2009, the incidence of emergency department visits for patients seeking dental treatment increased by 16 percent, rising from 874,000 to 936,432 visits, the report also found.

Dental cavities was the first-listed diagnosis, named in 42 percent of the ED visits. Dental abscesses were identified as the cause of 37 percent of the visits. Dental abscesses were the principal diagnosis for 62 percent of the dental-related inpatient stays, according to the report.

Uninsured people, Medicaid beneficiaries and the young were most likely to make dental-related emergency department visits. The visit rates were far more common in rural areas where dentists are often scarce.

“Patients that are going to the ED [for dental care] are totally different from the general ED population,” Ernest Moy, M.D., a medical officer at AHRQ’s Center for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, told Rob Goszkowski, who wrote about the report for DrBicuspid.com.

“About half of all ED visits are from the elderly, 65 and older, but this is a much, much younger group. The peak age we found in terms of rates of use of the ED [for dental] was 25 to 29, a group that generally doesn’t use the ED that much.”

The findings are to be included the Congressionally mandated National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports which inform legislators about the overall quality of health care in the United States, as well as disparities in care, Moy told DrBicuspid.com.

“Many of our products target state policymakers,” he added. “It helps them understand areas where their state is strong and others where problems need to be addressed.”

The findings come out of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), a group of health care databases developed through federal, state and industry collaboration. The databases represent the combined data collection efforts of state data organizations, hospital associations, private data organizations, and the federal government and are intended as a national information resource of patient-level health care data.

According to the HHS, HCUP includes the largest collection of longitudinal hospital care data in the United States. The databases enable research on a broad range of health policy issues, including cost and quality of health services, medical practice patterns, access to health care programs, and outcomes of treatments at the national, State, and local market levels.

Get more information about HCUP’s Nationwide Emergency Department Sample.

The findings of the federal report echo those contained in another study released by the Pew Center on the States. “A Costly Dental Destination: Hospital Care Means States Pay Dearly” found that financially stressed states have been required to bear the cost of expensive emergency treatment for decay, abscesses and other dental ailments.

The Pew study, which estimated that preventable dental conditions were the primary reason for 830,590 emergency department visits by Americans in 2009, concluded that states could reduce hospital visits, strengthen oral health and reduce their costs by making modest investments to improve access to preventive care.

The philanthropy attributed the increase in hospital visits to the difficulty that disadvantaged people face in getting preventive care from dentists, noting that in 2009, 56 percent of Medicaid-enrolled children did not receive dental care — not even a routine exam.

“The fact that so many Americans go to hospitals for dental care shows the delivery system is failing,” said Shelly Gehshan, director of the Pew Children’s Dental Campaign.

“The care provided in an ER is much more expensive, and it generally doesn’t solve dental problems. Most hospital ERs are not staffed with dentists and the medical personnel who work there are not trained to treat the underlying problems of patients with untreated dental issues.”

International effort to control mercury calls for improved oral health

Mary Otto

About Mary Otto

Mary Otto, a Washington, D.C.-based freelancer, is AHCJ's topic leader on oral health, curating related material at healthjournalism.org. She welcomes questions and suggestions on oral health resources at mary@healthjournalism.org.

Preventing tooth decay not only helps people; it helps the environment, according to a newly announced United Nations-backed convention.

Less tooth decay means fewer amalgam fillings and, from an environmental standpoint, that means less mercury waste entering the world’s air, water and soil.

Photo by tallasiandude, via Flickr.com.

The Minamata Convention on Mercury – approved on Jan. 19 in Geneva and named after a Japanese city where the industrial release of mercury led to devastating health consequences – aims to reduce the amount of mercury released into the environment by mining operations, power plants and other industries and businesses, including dental practices.

The hazardous use of mercury in gold mining was a major focus of the convention, which requires governments to develop national action plans to ban the most harmful forms of mercury use.

While the accord did not ban the use of dental amalgams, it called for nations to set objectives aimed at dental disease prevention and health promotion that would minimize the need for dental restorations. The treaty also called for research and development of mercury-free materials for restorations and for the promotion of sound environmental practices that would reduce the release of mercury waste by dental clinics.

The convention was applauded by dental groups, including the International Association for Dental Research and the American Dental Association which oppose the banning of mercury for dental uses.

Caries, the disease that causes tooth decay, afflicts 90 percent of the world’s population, making this a global public health issue,” ADA president Dr. Robert A. Faiella told ADA News.

“The ADA is gratified that the treaty conditions pertaining to dental amalgam protect this important treatment option without restrictions for our patients while balancing the need to protect the environment. It is vital for people throughout the world to continue to have access to a safe, durable, affordable treatment for tooth decay.”

Dental amalgam, which contains mercury predominantly bound to metals including silver, zinc, copper and tin, has been used for dental restorations for over 150 years. And while questions about its safety remain a subject of intense debate for some consumer groups, amalgam’s continued use has long been defended by mainstream dental organizations.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency defines mercury as a neurotoxicant and observes that “outbreaks of methylmercury poisonings have made it clear that adults, children, and developing fetuses are at risk from ingestion exposure to mercury.”

Exposure can occur when people eat fish containing methylmercury, break products containing elemental mercury, or use compounds that contain mercury, according to the EPA.

In 2009, the US Food and Drug Administration acknowledged that dental amalgam “releases low levels of mercury vapor, a chemical that at high exposure levels is well-documented to cause neurological and renal adverse health effects.”  The rule went on to state that “clinical studies had not established a causal link between dental amalgam and adverse health effects in adults and children age 6 or over.”

The FDA issued a regulation classifying dental amalgam and its component parts – elemental mercury and a powder alloy as a Class II (moderate risk) medical device, recommending that the product labeling include:

  • A warning against the use of dental amalgam in patients with mercury allergy;
  • A warning that dental professionals use adequate ventilation when handling dental amalgam;
  • A statement discussing the scientific evidence on the benefits and risk of dental amalgam, including the risks of inhaled mercury vapor. The statement will help dentists and patients make informed decisions about the use of dental amalgam.

The agency revisited the question of amalgam safety in 2010. At a two-day meeting, the question of how much mercury people with amalgam fillings were exposed to was put to an expert panel.

The panel was asked to weigh questions about the validity and usefulness of the many clinical studies that focused upon the possible risks of dental amalgam and also heard testimony from practitioners who vouched for the safety of amalgam and patients who blamed a range of illnesses on their amalgam fillings.

Based upon the feedback of the panel, and its own review of testimony about risk assessment and the value of various clinical studies, the FDA was expected to decide whether to make changes in how it regulates the use of the material. When asked for an update on such a decision, FDA spokeswoman Michelle Bolek said, “The FDA is continuing to review and evaluate the safety of amalgam and will let the public know if there are any changes to our current recommendations.”